Why choose Novablast 4?Buy Novablast 4 if
+2.1 Weight Efficiency+2.1 Weight Efficiency: Better measured rating in wear-test consensus.


+2.1 Weight Efficiency: Better measured rating in wear-test consensus.
+1.5 Stability & Support: Better measured rating in wear-test consensus.
Side-by-side selection criteria grounded in verified mechanical specs

Choose the Novablast 4 if your priority is an ultralight chassis with effortless turnover powered by FF BLAST+ Eco supercritical foam and a noticeably lighter weight (260g vs 286g). It is the better match for runners targeting minimizing leg fatigue across late-mile splits over the Triumph 22's focus on neutral support and surefooted stride containment.

Choose the Triumph 22 if your priority is a secure, planted base with confident guidance powered by Full-length PWRRUN PB beaded PEBA superfoam (286g). It is the better match for runners targeting neutral support and surefooted stride containment over the Novablast 4's focus on high-mileage protection and low-impact recovery cruising.
Critical biomechanical trade-offs to avoid buying the wrong shoe
Skip Novablast 4 if you need medial guidance for moderate to severe overpronation; the tall, softly sculpted platform shifts under lateral load.
Skip Triumph 22 if you want a featherweight speed-day shoe; at 286g, it is calibrated for workhorse longevity rather than race pace.
Real-world wear-test consensus across runner foot profiles
| RADAR AXIS | Novablast 4 | Triumph 22 | Δ DELTA | COHORT RANK |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cushioning & Softness | 9.1 | 9.0 | +0.1 (Novablast 4 higher by 0.1) | #4/18 |
| Energy Return & Bounce | 9.0 | 7.6 | +1.4 (Novablast 4 higher by 1.4) | #4/18 |
| Weight Efficiency | 8.7 | 6.6 | +2.1 (Novablast 4 higher by 2.1) | #4/18 |
| Stability & Support | 6.2 | 7.7 | −1.5 (Triumph 22 higher by NaN) | #4/18 |
| Traction & Grip | 7.6 | 8.0 | −0.4 (Triumph 22 higher by NaN) | #4/18 |
| Upper Comfort & Lockdown | 8.3 | 8.5 | −0.2 (Triumph 22 higher by NaN) | #4/18 |
| Breathability | 8.6 | 7.4 | +1.2 (Novablast 4 higher by 1.2) | #4/18 |
| Durability | 7.9 | 8.1 | −0.2 (Triumph 22 higher by NaN) | #4/18 |
| Meta-Score | 82strong | 81contender | +1.0 | Calibrated |
Cohort-relative percentiles and verified technical specs
›ASICS Novablast 4 saves 26g per stride, noticeable after mile 6 of continuous running.
›ASICS Novablast 4 delivers 4.5mm more vibration isolation for long recovery efforts than Triumph 22.
›Triumph 22's 10mm drop shifts load toward the knees/quads, while Novablast 4's 8mm drop engages the Achilles and calves.
›FF BLAST+ Eco supercritical foam yields a springier, high-rebound toe-off compared to Full-length PWRRUN PB beaded PEBA superfoam's grounded, stable feel.
›Triumph 22 utilizes XT-900 carbon rubber pods compound formulated for extended 500+ mile abrasive asphalt longevity.
Real-world wear-test consensus across runner foot profiles
Cohort-relative percentiles and verified technical specs
›ASICS Novablast 4 saves 26g per stride, noticeable after mile 6 of continuous running.
›ASICS Novablast 4 delivers 4.5mm more vibration isolation for long recovery efforts than Triumph 22.
›Triumph 22's 10mm drop shifts load toward the knees/quads, while Novablast 4's 8mm drop engages the Achilles and calves.
›FF BLAST+ Eco supercritical foam yields a springier, high-rebound toe-off compared to Full-length PWRRUN PB beaded PEBA superfoam's grounded, stable feel.
›Triumph 22 utilizes XT-900 carbon rubber pods compound formulated for extended 500+ mile abrasive asphalt longevity.
| RADAR AXIS | Novablast 4 | Triumph 22 | Δ DELTA | COHORT RANK |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cushioning & Softness | 9.1 | 9.0 | +0.1 (Novablast 4 higher by 0.1) | #4/18 |
| Energy Return & Bounce | 9.0 | 7.6 | +1.4 (Novablast 4 higher by 1.4) | #4/18 |
| Weight Efficiency | 8.7 | 6.6 | +2.1 (Novablast 4 higher by 2.1) | #4/18 |
| Stability & Support | 6.2 | 7.7 | −1.5 (Triumph 22 higher by NaN) | #4/18 |
| Traction & Grip | 7.6 | 8.0 | −0.4 (Triumph 22 higher by NaN) | #4/18 |
| Upper Comfort & Lockdown | 8.3 | 8.5 | −0.2 (Triumph 22 higher by NaN) | #4/18 |
| Breathability | 8.6 | 7.4 | +1.2 (Novablast 4 higher by 1.2) | #4/18 |
| Durability | 7.9 | 8.1 | −0.2 (Triumph 22 higher by NaN) | #4/18 |
| Meta-Score | 82strong | 81contender | +1.0 | Calibrated |
Side-by-side selection criteria grounded in verified mechanical specs

Choose the Novablast 4 if your priority is an ultralight chassis with effortless turnover powered by FF BLAST+ Eco supercritical foam and a noticeably lighter weight (260g vs 286g). It is the better match for runners targeting minimizing leg fatigue across late-mile splits over the Triumph 22's focus on neutral support and surefooted stride containment.

Choose the Triumph 22 if your priority is a secure, planted base with confident guidance powered by Full-length PWRRUN PB beaded PEBA superfoam (286g). It is the better match for runners targeting neutral support and surefooted stride containment over the Novablast 4's focus on high-mileage protection and low-impact recovery cruising.
Both models occupy the exact same max cushion slot on your shoe rack. Rather than buying both, runner consensus suggests picking the lighter Novablast 4 (260g) for quicker cadence, or the Triumph 22 for its Full-length PWRRUN PB beaded PEBA superfoam ride feel and structure.
High-traffic benchmark rivalries and cohort showdowns