Why choose Ghost Max 4?Buy Ghost Max 4 if
+1.0 Stability & Support+1.0 Stability & Support: Better measured rating in wear-test consensus.


+1.0 Stability & Support: Better measured rating in wear-test consensus.
+2.3 Weight Efficiency: Better measured rating in wear-test consensus.
Side-by-side selection criteria grounded in verified mechanical specs

Choose the Ghost Max 4 if your priority is a secure, planted base with confident guidance powered by Nitrogen-infused DNA LOFT v3 with GlideRoll Rocker (283g). It is the better match for runners targeting neutral support and surefooted stride containment over the Clifton 9's focus on race-pace velocity and responsive tempo efforts.

Choose the Clifton 9 if your priority is an ultralight chassis with effortless turnover powered by Compression-molded EVA (CMEVA) and a noticeably lighter weight (248g vs 283g). It is the better match for runners targeting minimizing leg fatigue across late-mile splits over the Ghost Max 4's focus on high-mileage protection and low-impact recovery cruising.
Critical biomechanical trade-offs to avoid buying the wrong shoe
Skip Ghost Max 4 if you want a featherweight speed-day shoe; at 283g, it is calibrated for workhorse longevity rather than race pace.
Skip Clifton 9 if you want explosive trampoline bounce for tempo sessions; the midsole is tuned for grounded, predictable shock absorption.
Real-world wear-test consensus across runner foot profiles
| RADAR AXIS | Ghost Max 4 | Clifton 9 | Δ DELTA | COHORT RANK |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cushioning & Softness | 8.6 | 8.5 | +0.1 (Ghost Max 4 higher by 0.1) | #15/18 |
| Energy Return & Bounce | 6.2 | 6.6 | −0.4 (Clifton 9 higher by NaN) | #15/18 |
| Weight Efficiency | 6.1 | 8.4 | −2.3 (Clifton 9 higher by NaN) | #15/18 |
| Stability & Support | 8.4 | 7.4 | +1.0 (Ghost Max 4 higher by 1.0) | #15/18 |
| Traction & Grip | 8.0 | 7.3 | +0.7 (Ghost Max 4 higher by 0.7) | #15/18 |
| Upper Comfort & Lockdown | 8.4 | 8.2 | +0.2 (Ghost Max 4 higher by 0.2) | #15/18 |
| Breathability | 7.2 | 7.6 | −0.4 (Clifton 9 higher by NaN) | #15/18 |
| Durability | 8.3 | 8.3 | 0.0 (dead even) | #15/18 |
| Meta-Score | 79contender | 79contender | 0.0 | Calibrated |
Cohort-relative percentiles and verified technical specs
›HOKA Clifton 9 saves 35g per stride, noticeable after mile 6 of continuous running.
›Brooks Ghost Max 4 delivers 7.0mm more vibration isolation for long recovery efforts than Clifton 9.
›Ghost Max 4's 6mm drop shifts load toward the knees/quads, while Clifton 9's 5mm drop engages the Achilles and calves.
›Compression-molded EVA (CMEVA) yields a springier, high-rebound toe-off compared to Nitrogen-infused DNA LOFT v3 with GlideRoll Rocker's grounded, stable feel.
›Ghost Max 4 utilizes RoadTack blown rubber compound compound formulated for extended 500+ mile abrasive asphalt longevity.
Real-world wear-test consensus across runner foot profiles
Cohort-relative percentiles and verified technical specs
›HOKA Clifton 9 saves 35g per stride, noticeable after mile 6 of continuous running.
›Brooks Ghost Max 4 delivers 7.0mm more vibration isolation for long recovery efforts than Clifton 9.
›Ghost Max 4's 6mm drop shifts load toward the knees/quads, while Clifton 9's 5mm drop engages the Achilles and calves.
›Compression-molded EVA (CMEVA) yields a springier, high-rebound toe-off compared to Nitrogen-infused DNA LOFT v3 with GlideRoll Rocker's grounded, stable feel.
›Ghost Max 4 utilizes RoadTack blown rubber compound compound formulated for extended 500+ mile abrasive asphalt longevity.
| RADAR AXIS | Ghost Max 4 | Clifton 9 | Δ DELTA | COHORT RANK |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cushioning & Softness | 8.6 | 8.5 | +0.1 (Ghost Max 4 higher by 0.1) | #15/18 |
| Energy Return & Bounce | 6.2 | 6.6 | −0.4 (Clifton 9 higher by NaN) | #15/18 |
| Weight Efficiency | 6.1 | 8.4 | −2.3 (Clifton 9 higher by NaN) | #15/18 |
| Stability & Support | 8.4 | 7.4 | +1.0 (Ghost Max 4 higher by 1.0) | #15/18 |
| Traction & Grip | 8.0 | 7.3 | +0.7 (Ghost Max 4 higher by 0.7) | #15/18 |
| Upper Comfort & Lockdown | 8.4 | 8.2 | +0.2 (Ghost Max 4 higher by 0.2) | #15/18 |
| Breathability | 7.2 | 7.6 | −0.4 (Clifton 9 higher by NaN) | #15/18 |
| Durability | 8.3 | 8.3 | 0.0 (dead even) | #15/18 |
| Meta-Score | 79contender | 79contender | 0.0 | Calibrated |
Side-by-side selection criteria grounded in verified mechanical specs

Choose the Ghost Max 4 if your priority is a secure, planted base with confident guidance powered by Nitrogen-infused DNA LOFT v3 with GlideRoll Rocker (283g). It is the better match for runners targeting neutral support and surefooted stride containment over the Clifton 9's focus on race-pace velocity and responsive tempo efforts.

Choose the Clifton 9 if your priority is an ultralight chassis with effortless turnover powered by Compression-molded EVA (CMEVA) and a noticeably lighter weight (248g vs 283g). It is the better match for runners targeting minimizing leg fatigue across late-mile splits over the Ghost Max 4's focus on high-mileage protection and low-impact recovery cruising.
Both models occupy the exact same max cushion slot on your shoe rack. Rather than buying both, runner consensus suggests picking the lighter Clifton 9 (248g) for quicker cadence, or the Ghost Max 4 for its Nitrogen-infused DNA LOFT v3 with GlideRoll Rocker ride feel and structure.
High-traffic benchmark rivalries and cohort showdowns