Head-to-Head Comparison
Brooks · Max Cushion

Ghost Max 4

79
Brooks Ghost Max 4
Stack39mm
Weight283g
Drop6mm
HOKA · Max Cushion

Clifton 9

79
HOKA Clifton 9
Stack32mm
Weight248g
Drop5mm

Key Differences & Advantages

Dead even (79 PTS)

Why choose Ghost Max 4?Buy Ghost Max 4 if

+1.0 Stability & Support

+1.0 Stability & Support: Better measured rating in wear-test consensus.

Why choose Clifton 9?Buy Clifton 9 if

+2.3 Weight Efficiency

+2.3 Weight Efficiency: Better measured rating in wear-test consensus.

The Runner's Pick

Final Decision: Who Buys Which Model?

Side-by-side selection criteria grounded in verified mechanical specs

Brooks Ghost Max 4
Brooks

Ghost Max 4

79
Choose the Ghost Max 4 if:

Choose the Ghost Max 4 if your priority is a secure, planted base with confident guidance powered by Nitrogen-infused DNA LOFT v3 with GlideRoll Rocker (283g). It is the better match for runners targeting neutral support and surefooted stride containment over the Clifton 9's focus on race-pace velocity and responsive tempo efforts.

6mm drop · 283g · $150Audit
HOKA Clifton 9
HOKA

Clifton 9

79
Choose the Clifton 9 if:

Choose the Clifton 9 if your priority is an ultralight chassis with effortless turnover powered by Compression-molded EVA (CMEVA) and a noticeably lighter weight (248g vs 283g). It is the better match for runners targeting minimizing leg fatigue across late-mile splits over the Ghost Max 4's focus on high-mileage protection and low-impact recovery cruising.

5mm drop · 248g · $145Audit
!

Dealbreaker Warnings · Who Should Skip These

Critical biomechanical trade-offs to avoid buying the wrong shoe

Brooks Ghost Max 4

Skip Ghost Max 4 if you want a featherweight speed-day shoe; at 283g, it is calibrated for workhorse longevity rather than race pace.

HOKA Clifton 9

Skip Clifton 9 if you want explosive trampoline bounce for tempo sessions; the midsole is tuned for grounded, predictable shock absorption.

8-Axis Telemetry Radar

Dead even · 79 PTS

Ghost79vsClifton79
CushioningEnergy ReturnWeight EfficiencyStabilityTractionUpper ComfortBreathabilityDurability
🔬 Inspect Granular Lab Specs & Fit Telemetry▼

Fit & Sizing Consensus

Real-world wear-test consensus across runner foot profiles

Ghost Max 4
Clifton 9
Sizing LengthSizing differs
Runs Small
Clifton69%
True to Size
Ghost87%
Runs Large
Ghost Max 4: True to size(n=38)
Clifton 9: Runs small — consider 0.5 size up(n=24)
Toe Box WidthSizing differs
Performance Tight
Clifton57%
Standard
Ghost82%
Wide
Ghost Max 4: Standard width(n=33)
Clifton 9: Performance tight / narrow(n=21)
Arch SupportMatch
Flat / Low
Neutral Stability
Ghost85%Clifton73%
High Arch
Ghost Max 4: Neutral stability / moderate arch(n=27)
Clifton 9: Neutral stability / moderate arch(n=18)
Brooks Ghost Max 4 vs HOKA Clifton 9 — eight cohort-calibrated radar axes scored one to ten. Delta is Ghost Max 4 minus Clifton 9; positive favors Ghost Max 4. Score provenance: v1.0, data vintage 2026-10-25. Meta-Score weights score band names.
RADAR AXISGhost Max 4Clifton 9Δ DELTACOHORT RANK
Cushioning & Softness8.68.5+0.1 (Ghost Max 4 higher by 0.1)#15/18
Energy Return & Bounce6.26.6−0.4 (Clifton 9 higher by NaN)#15/18
Weight Efficiency6.18.4−2.3 (Clifton 9 higher by NaN)#15/18
Stability & Support8.47.4+1.0 (Ghost Max 4 higher by 1.0)#15/18
Traction & Grip8.07.3+0.7 (Ghost Max 4 higher by 0.7)#15/18
Upper Comfort & Lockdown8.48.2+0.2 (Ghost Max 4 higher by 0.2)#15/18
Breathability7.27.6−0.4 (Clifton 9 higher by NaN)#15/18
Durability8.38.30.0 (dead even)#15/18
Meta-Score79contender79contender0.0Calibrated

The Record · Specification Telemetry

Cohort-relative percentiles and verified technical specs

Ghost Max 4
Clifton 9
Weight (US Men's 9)Lighter than 83% of daily trainers
Ghost Max 4283g
Clifton 9248g

›HOKA Clifton 9 saves 35g per stride, noticeable after mile 6 of continuous running.

Heel Cushion StackMore underfoot foam than 53% of trainers
Ghost Max 439.0mm
Clifton 932.0mm

›Brooks Ghost Max 4 delivers 7.0mm more vibration isolation for long recovery efforts than Clifton 9.

Heel-to-Toe DropΔ 1.0mm
Ghost Max 46.0mm
Clifton 95.0mm

›Ghost Max 4's 6mm drop shifts load toward the knees/quads, while Clifton 9's 5mm drop engages the Achilles and calves.

Midsole Foam & Energy ReturnHigher rebound than 67% of tested foams
Nitrogen-infused DNA LOFT v3 with GlideRoll Rocker6.2/10
Compression-molded EVA (CMEVA)6.6/10

›Compression-molded EVA (CMEVA) yields a springier, high-rebound toe-off compared to Nitrogen-infused DNA LOFT v3 with GlideRoll Rocker's grounded, stable feel.

Outsole Durability & TractionTougher rubber than 87% of road shoes
RoadTack blown rubber compound8.3/10
Thin rubber pods on exposed CMEVA8.3/10

›Ghost Max 4 utilizes RoadTack blown rubber compound compound formulated for extended 500+ mile abrasive asphalt longevity.

Quiver Overlap

Direct Max Cushion Rivals

2-Shoe Rotation Strategy

Both models occupy the exact same max cushion slot on your shoe rack. Rather than buying both, runner consensus suggests picking the lighter Clifton 9 (248g) for quicker cadence, or the Ghost Max 4 for its Nitrogen-infused DNA LOFT v3 with GlideRoll Rocker ride feel and structure.

Ghost Max 4 RoleMax Cushion Workhorse
Clifton 9 RoleAlternative Max Cushion

Explore Related Showdowns

High-traffic benchmark rivalries and cohort showdowns