Head-to-Head Comparison
Brooks · Trail
WINNER

Catamount 3

73
Brooks Catamount 3
Stack30mm
Weight267g
Drop6mm
Salomon · Trail

Sense Ride 5

72
Salomon Sense Ride 5
Stack29.6mm
Weight293g
Drop8.3mm

Key Differences & Advantages

73–72 · average

Why choose Catamount 3?Buy Catamount 3 if

+1.6 Weight Efficiency

+1.6 Weight Efficiency: Better measured rating in wear-test consensus.

Why choose Sense Ride 5?Buy Sense Ride 5 if

+0.9 Upper Comfort & Lockdown

+0.9 Upper Comfort & Fit: More secure midfoot lockdown and step-in comfort.

The Runner's Pick

Final Decision: Who Buys Which Model?

Side-by-side selection criteria grounded in verified mechanical specs

Brooks Catamount 3
Brooks

Catamount 3

73
Choose the Catamount 3 if:

Choose the Catamount 3 if your priority is an ultralight chassis with effortless turnover powered by DNA FLASH v2 nitrogen-infused foam and a noticeably lighter weight (267g vs 293g). It is the better match for runners targeting minimizing leg fatigue across late-mile splits over the Sense Ride 5's focus on neutral support and surefooted stride containment.

6mm drop · 267g · $170Audit
Salomon Sense Ride 5
Salomon

Sense Ride 5

72
Choose the Sense Ride 5 if:

Choose the Sense Ride 5 if your priority is plush step-in collar padding and irritation-free lockdown powered by energyFOAM lightweight rebound foam (293g). It is the better match for runners targeting friction-free blister prevention across long endurance sessions over the Catamount 3's focus on race-pace velocity and responsive tempo efforts.

8.3mm drop · 293g · $140Audit
!

Dealbreaker Warnings · Who Should Skip These

Critical biomechanical trade-offs to avoid buying the wrong shoe

Brooks Catamount 3

Skip Catamount 3 if you need medial guidance for moderate to severe overpronation; the tall, softly sculpted platform shifts under lateral load.

Salomon Sense Ride 5

Skip Sense Ride 5 if you want a featherweight speed-day shoe; at 293g, it is calibrated for workhorse longevity rather than race pace.

8-Axis Telemetry Radar

Catamount 3 leads by +1.0 PTS

Catamount73vsSense72
CushioningEnergy ReturnWeight EfficiencyStabilityTractionUpper ComfortBreathabilityDurability
🔬 Inspect Granular Lab Specs & Fit Telemetry▼

Fit & Sizing Consensus

Real-world wear-test consensus across runner foot profiles

Catamount 3
Sense Ride 5
Sizing LengthMatch
Runs Small
True to Size
Catamount76%Sense81%
Runs Large
Catamount 3: True to size(n=26)
Sense Ride 5: True to size(n=31)
Toe Box WidthSizing differs
Performance Tight
Sense68%
Standard
Catamount70%
Wide
Catamount 3: Standard width(n=22)
Sense Ride 5: Performance tight / narrow(n=24)
Arch SupportSizing differs
Flat / Low
Catamount66%
Neutral Stability
Sense74%
High Arch
Catamount 3: Flat / low arch(n=19)
Sense Ride 5: Neutral stability / moderate arch(n=25)
Brooks Catamount 3 vs Salomon Sense Ride 5 — eight cohort-calibrated radar axes scored one to ten. Delta is Catamount 3 minus Sense Ride 5; positive favors Catamount 3. Score provenance: v1.0, data vintage 2026-10-27. Meta-Score weights score band names.
RADAR AXISCatamount 3Sense Ride 5Δ DELTACOHORT RANK
Cushioning & Softness7.27.20.0 (dead even)#26/28
Energy Return & Bounce7.96.6+1.3 (Catamount 3 higher by 1.3)#26/28
Weight Efficiency7.45.8+1.6 (Catamount 3 higher by 1.6)#26/28
Stability & Support6.66.7−0.1 (Sense Ride 5 higher by NaN)#26/28
Traction & Grip8.48.2+0.2 (Catamount 3 higher by 0.2)#26/28
Upper Comfort & Lockdown6.87.7−0.9 (Sense Ride 5 higher by NaN)#26/28
Breathability6.86.9−0.1 (Sense Ride 5 higher by NaN)#26/28
Durability6.67.3−0.7 (Sense Ride 5 higher by NaN)#26/28
Meta-Score73average72average+1.0Calibrated

The Record · Specification Telemetry

Cohort-relative percentiles and verified technical specs

Catamount 3
Sense Ride 5
Weight (US Men's 9)Lighter than 74% of daily trainers
Catamount 3267g
Sense Ride 5293g

›Brooks Catamount 3 saves 26g per stride, noticeable after mile 6 of continuous running.

Heel Cushion StackMore underfoot foam than 45% of trainers
Catamount 330.0mm
Sense Ride 529.6mm

›Brooks Catamount 3 delivers 0.4mm more vibration isolation for long recovery efforts than Sense Ride 5.

Heel-to-Toe DropΔ 2.3mm
Catamount 36.0mm
Sense Ride 58.3mm

›Sense Ride 5's 8.3mm drop shifts load toward the knees/quads, while Catamount 3's 6mm drop engages the Achilles and calves.

Midsole Foam & Energy ReturnHigher rebound than 81% of tested foams
DNA FLASH v2 nitrogen-infused foam7.9/10
energyFOAM lightweight rebound foam6.6/10

›DNA FLASH v2 nitrogen-infused foam yields a springier, high-rebound toe-off compared to energyFOAM lightweight rebound foam's grounded, stable feel.

Outsole Durability & TractionTougher rubber than 77% of road shoes
TrailTack Green rubber6.6/10
All Terrain Contagrip rubber7.3/10

›Sense Ride 5 utilizes All Terrain Contagrip rubber compound formulated for extended 500+ mile abrasive asphalt longevity.

Quiver Overlap

Direct Trail Rivals

2-Shoe Rotation Strategy

Both models occupy the exact same trail slot on your shoe rack. Rather than buying both, runner consensus suggests picking the lighter Catamount 3 (267g) for quicker cadence, or the Sense Ride 5 for its energyFOAM lightweight rebound foam ride feel and structure.

Catamount 3 RoleTrail Workhorse
Sense Ride 5 RoleAlternative Trail

Explore Related Showdowns

High-traffic benchmark rivalries and cohort showdowns