Head-to-Head Comparison
HOKA · Trail
WINNER

Mafate Speed 4

80
HOKA Mafate Speed 4
Stack33mm
Weight295g
Drop4mm
Salomon · Trail

Speedcross 6

78
Salomon Speedcross 6
Stack32mm
Weight298g
Drop10mm

Key Differences & Advantages

80–78 · contender

Why choose Mafate Speed 4?Buy Mafate Speed 4 if

+1.2 Weight Efficiency

+1.2 Weight Efficiency: Better measured rating in wear-test consensus.

Why choose Speedcross 6?Buy Speedcross 6 if

+0.4 Durability

+0.4 Durability: Better measured rating in wear-test consensus.

The Runner's Pick

Final Decision: Who Buys Which Model?

Side-by-side selection criteria grounded in verified mechanical specs

HOKA Mafate Speed 4
HOKA

Mafate Speed 4

80
Choose the Mafate Speed 4 if:

Choose the Mafate Speed 4 if your priority is an ultralight chassis with effortless turnover powered by Dual-density ProFly midsole (295g). It is the better match for runners targeting minimizing leg fatigue across late-mile splits over the Speedcross 6's focus on all-weather grip and confident cornering on slick streets.

4mm drop · 295g · $185Audit
Salomon Speedcross 6
Salomon

Speedcross 6

78
Choose the Speedcross 6 if:

Choose the Speedcross 6 if your priority is heavy-duty outsole coverage and resilient midsole longevity powered by EnergyCell+ EVA (298g). It is the better match for runners targeting logging 400+ grueling training miles without early breakdown over the Mafate Speed 4's focus on high-mileage protection and low-impact recovery cruising.

10mm drop · 298g · $150Audit
!

Dealbreaker Warnings · Who Should Skip These

Critical biomechanical trade-offs to avoid buying the wrong shoe

HOKA Mafate Speed 4

Skip Mafate Speed 4 if your mileage includes paved asphalt or concrete; aggressive 5mm lugs wear rapidly on hard surfaces and cause harsh ground shock.

Salomon Speedcross 6

Skip Speedcross 6 if your mileage includes paved asphalt or concrete; aggressive 5mm lugs wear rapidly on hard surfaces and cause harsh ground shock.

8-Axis Telemetry Radar

Mafate Speed 4 leads by +2.0 PTS

Mafate80vsSpeedcross78
CushioningEnergy ReturnWeight EfficiencyStabilityTractionUpper ComfortBreathabilityDurability
🔬 Inspect Granular Lab Specs & Fit Telemetry▼

Fit & Sizing Consensus

Real-world wear-test consensus across runner foot profiles

Mafate Speed 4
Speedcross 6
Sizing LengthMatch
Runs Small
True to Size
Mafate78%Speedcross71%
Runs Large
Mafate Speed 4: True to size(n=26)
Speedcross 6: True to size(n=17)
Toe Box WidthSizing differs
Performance Tight
Speedcross83%
Standard
Wide
Mafate74%
Mafate Speed 4: Roomy / wide toe box(n=26)
Speedcross 6: Performance tight / narrow(n=15)
Arch SupportMatch
Flat / Low
Neutral Stability
Mafate68%Speedcross59%
High Arch
Mafate Speed 4: Neutral stability / moderate arch(n=18)
Speedcross 6: Neutral stability / moderate arch(n=13)
HOKA Mafate Speed 4 vs Salomon Speedcross 6 — eight cohort-calibrated radar axes scored one to ten. Delta is Mafate Speed 4 minus Speedcross 6; positive favors Mafate Speed 4. Score provenance: v1.0, data vintage 2026-10-27. Meta-Score weights score band names.
RADAR AXISMafate Speed 4Speedcross 6Δ DELTACOHORT RANK
Cushioning & Softness7.86.9+0.9 (Mafate Speed 4 higher by 0.9)#9/28
Energy Return & Bounce6.66.1+0.5 (Mafate Speed 4 higher by 0.5)#9/28
Weight Efficiency7.66.4+1.2 (Mafate Speed 4 higher by 1.2)#9/28
Stability & Support7.97.90.0 (dead even)#9/28
Traction & Grip9.29.5−0.3 (Speedcross 6 higher by NaN)#9/28
Upper Comfort & Lockdown7.98.0−0.1 (Speedcross 6 higher by NaN)#9/28
Breathability7.46.3+1.1 (Mafate Speed 4 higher by 1.1)#9/28
Durability7.88.2−0.4 (Speedcross 6 higher by NaN)#9/28
Meta-Score80contender78contender+2.0Calibrated

The Record · Specification Telemetry

Cohort-relative percentiles and verified technical specs

Mafate Speed 4
Speedcross 6
Weight (US Men's 9)Lighter than 62% of daily trainers
Mafate Speed 4295g
Speedcross 6298g

›HOKA Mafate Speed 4 saves 3g per stride, noticeable after mile 6 of continuous running.

Heel Cushion StackMore underfoot foam than 45% of trainers
Mafate Speed 433.0mm
Speedcross 632.0mm

›HOKA Mafate Speed 4 delivers 1.0mm more vibration isolation for long recovery efforts than Speedcross 6.

Heel-to-Toe DropΔ 6.0mm
Mafate Speed 44.0mm
Speedcross 610.0mm

›Speedcross 6's 10mm drop shifts load toward the knees/quads, while Mafate Speed 4's 4mm drop engages the Achilles and calves.

Midsole Foam & Energy ReturnHigher rebound than 67% of tested foams
Dual-density ProFly midsole6.6/10
EnergyCell+ EVA6.1/10

›Dual-density ProFly midsole yields a springier, high-rebound toe-off compared to EnergyCell+ EVA's grounded, stable feel.

Outsole Durability & TractionTougher rubber than 86% of road shoes
Vibram Megagrip Litebase with micro lugs7.8/10
All-Weather Contagrip with Deepcutter lugs8.2/10

›Speedcross 6 utilizes All-Weather Contagrip with Deepcutter lugs compound formulated for extended 500+ mile abrasive asphalt longevity.

Quiver Overlap

Direct Trail Rivals

2-Shoe Rotation Strategy

Both models occupy the exact same trail slot on your shoe rack. Rather than buying both, runner consensus suggests picking the lighter Mafate Speed 4 (295g) for quicker cadence, or the Speedcross 6 for its EnergyCell+ EVA ride feel and structure.

Mafate Speed 4 RoleTrail Workhorse
Speedcross 6 RoleAlternative Trail

Explore Related Showdowns

High-traffic benchmark rivalries and cohort showdowns